Fit-and-Proper vs. Reliability Screening: KWG § 25c Explained
Three terms that are often confused: Fit-and-Proper, Reliability Screening, and § 25c KWG. For compliance leaders in banks and financial institutions, it is essential to know the difference — and where they overlap.
Fit-and-Proper: The Concept
"Fit and Proper" is a well-established Europe-wide concept: people in key functions at financial institutions must be professionally qualified (fit) and personally reliable (proper).
“Fit” — professional suitability
Professional qualifications (degree, relevant work experience)
Professional competence for the specific role
Experience in comparable positions
Evidence of continuing professional development
“Proper” — personal reliability
No relevant convictions
No history of insolvency
No conflicts of interest
No issues on sanctions lists or with PEP status
Integrity in both professional and private life
§ 25c KWG: The German implementation
§ 25c KWG (German Banking Act) sets out the requirements for managing directors and supervisory board members of German banks and financial institutions. It is the specific German implementation of the Fit-and-Proper principle.
What § 25c KWG requires
Professional suitability:
At least three years of professional experience in a comparable function
Relevant specialist knowledge in banking, insurance, or capital markets law (depending on the role)
Leadership and management experience
Personal reliability:
No criminal convictions (especially in the areas of white-collar crime, property crimes, money laundering)
No pending criminal proceedings
No insolvency proceedings in the last 10 years
No supervisory or professional disciplinary proceedings
Reliability screening: The broader term
"Reliability screening" is a broader term than Fit-and-Proper. It refers to checking a person's integrity in the broadest sense — regardless of whether the role is regulated or not.
Reliability screening typically includes:
Identity verification
Credit check (where financial responsibility is involved)
Criminal record check
Sanctions list and PEP screening
Adverse media screening
Reference check
Legal bases (depending on the context):
§ 25c KWG (financial sector)
§ 7 GwG (money laundering officers)
§ 24 VAG (insurance companies)
§ 72a SGB VIII (educational professions)
SÜG (security-sensitive positions)
Private-law reliability screening (voluntary, for positions of trust)
What is the difference?
Criterion | Fit-and-Proper (§ 25c KWG) | Reliability screening (general) |
|---|---|---|
Who is affected? | Managing directors, supervisory board members, key functions in the financial sector | Anyone in a sensitive position (not just finance) |
Legal basis | Specific: KWG, VAG, ZAG, KAGB | Broad: BDSG, various sector-specific laws |
Scope of review | Professional suitability + personal reliability | Usually personal reliability only |
Mandatory? | Yes, legally required | Depends on the role and context |
Who checks? | BaFin (formal), institution (ongoing) | Employer, possibly external reviewers |
Consequence if deficient? | Rejection / removal by BaFin | No contract concluded, dismissal possible |
Who must pass a Fit-and-Proper assessment?
Under § 25c KWG and analogous regulations:
Managing directors of banks (board members, managing directors)
Supervisory board members of banks
Members of the management body of insurance companies (VAG)
Executives in asset management companies (KAGB)
Managing directors of payment service providers (ZAG)
Compliance officers in regulated institutions (depending on the role)
Money laundering officers (GwG § 7)
Fit-and-Proper in Switzerland, Austria, and across the EU
Switzerland — FINMA fit-and-proper assessment (Art. 3 BankG)
The Swiss equivalent to § 25c KWG is the FINMA fit-and-proper assessment. Legal basis: Art. 3 BankG (banks), Art. 11 FinIA (financial institutions), Art. 14 VAG (insurers). The board, board of directors, and management are assessed for a "guarantee of proper business conduct." A rejected fit-and-proper assessment can lead to the refusal or withdrawal of the license. The process is less formalized than with BaFin, but similar in substance.
Austria — FMA + BWG/VAG/WAG
The Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA) carries out fit-and-proper assessments under the Banking Act (BWG § 5), VAG, and WAG. The requirements are aligned with CRD and the EBA guidelines. A special feature in Austria: every time there is a change at the FMA — not just on initial appointment — the assessment is repeated.
EU-wide — EBA-ESMA + CRD VI
With the EBA-ESMA Joint Guidelines on Suitability 2024 and CRD VI, uniform standards are being established across the EU. New from 2026: CFOs and heads of control functions will fall under Fit-and-Proper across the EU — not just managing directors and supervisory board members. For cross-border institutions, this means a consistent assessment framework must be documented coherently across the EU.
From January 2026: Stricter requirements
BaFin has significantly tightened its Fit-and-Proper requirements for 2026:
Expanded group of people: No longer just managing directors, but also compliance officers and key second-line roles
Ongoing assessment: A one-time review at appointment is not enough. Continuous monitoring (sanctions, PEP, adverse media) is mandatory
Personal liability: Managing directors are personally liable for inadequate reviews — including retroactively for people hired before January 2026
Practical implementation: How to do it right
1. Create a role matrix
Which roles in the institution fall under § 25c KWG, which under § 7 GwG, and which are "only" relevant for reliability screening?
2. Define the depth of review per role
Managing directors: full Fit-and-Proper assessment under § 25c KWG
Compliance officers: reliability screening under the BaFin guidance notice
Employees in sensitive areas (credit, money laundering reporting office): enhanced screening
Other employees: standard pre-employment check
3. Automate the process
Manual reviews for 100+ roles are not scalable and are prone to errors. Automated screening with audit-proof documentation is mandatory.
4. Ongoing monitoring
At least monthly: sanctions list matching, PEP status, adverse media. Escalate immediately to Compliance if anything is flagged.
5. Documentation fit for a BaFin review
Every review with timestamp, source, and result. Retention period: at least 5 years.
Indicium for Fit-and-Proper workflows
Indicium covers all review areas under § 25c KWG and general reliability screening:
Identity, qualifications, references
Criminal record, insolvency status
Sanctions lists (EU, UN, OFAC) with ongoing monitoring
PEP screening including family members
Adverse media screening
BaFin-compliant, audit-proof documentation
Integration into HR systems (SAP, Workday, Personio)
All compliance documents in the Trust Center at trust.indicium.ag
Conclusion
Fit-and-Proper and reliability screening overlap, but they are legally and operationally different. For financial institutions, both are relevant in 2026 — with stricter requirements. If you switch to automated, ongoing processes now, you will be well positioned.
Book a demo and map the Fit-and-Proper workflow in a BaFin-compliant way.
Nabil El Berr




